中国科学院院士、知名国际物理学家杨振宁先生的辞世不仅是物理学界的巨大损失，也让教育界失去了一位精神导师。他的学习经历、科研精神与育人理念，对国际学校的现行教育理念与实践均有深刻启示。杨先生道，“学习有时不必追求即刻的“彻底搞懂”，而是在长期浸润中，让知识自然贯通。”

在宏润博源学校的课堂上，打破学科“墙壁”，一直是一件常见且自然的事。

杨先生提倡“渗透式学习法”，反对知识的割裂与灌输，强调“潜移默化”的积累与联结。这正与我校“个性化培养 + 跨学科融合”的教学培养模式高度契合。

陈文国校长认为，这种方法“恰恰击中了国际学校科学教育的核心需求——不追求一蹴而就的透彻，而强调潜移默化的积累”。他特别强调要打破学科壁垒，设计跨学科任务，“让知识在渗透中自然联结”。

杨振宁与李政道挑战“宇称守恒”的故事，成为培养学生批判性思维的绝佳素材。

陈文国校长指出，这一科学壮举“本质是‘基于证据的质疑精神’”。他主张在教学中“重现历史情境，让学生站在当时物理学家的角度分析矛盾数据”。

王文波老师将此理念融入AP物理课堂。“我专门重现了引发物理学革命的‘θ-τ之谜’，”他分享道，“学生们分成‘保守派物理学家’与‘杨振宁团队’，依据矛盾实验数据展开辩论。”王老师还会在实验中“故意设置误差或反直觉现象，引导学生质疑‘标准答案’，体会‘大胆假设、小心求证’的思维过程”。

面对如今学生容易“重技巧、轻基础”的浮躁心态，杨先生的格言“宁拙毋巧，宁朴毋华”无疑是一剂良方。

在我们看来，“拙”不是笨，是甘愿从头推导一个公式的扎实，是愿意下“笨功夫”的定力；“朴”不是土，是坚持记录实验原始数据的诚信，是追求事物本质的纯粹。

因此，我们不仅在基础教学中推行“公式溯源法”，拒绝学生直接套用结论；还建立了“实验原始数据备案制”，教师的评价会更聚焦于学生分析的深度与诚实原则，而非实验结果数据是否漂亮完美。我们相信，这种“拙朴”之功，才是学生未来学术道路上最可靠的基石。

从课程融合到思维训练，再到心态引导，我们发现，好的教育理念总是相通的。杨先生曾坦言，他早年的实验物理研究并不顺利，正是在不间断的探索推导反思后，才在理论物理领域找到了属于自己的星辰大海。

教育需勤耕不辍，方能厚积薄发。我校持之以恒不断实践的教育理念：不是把每一个独特的孩子都塞进同一个模子里，而是用心观察、用爱陪伴，帮助孩子们一起探索，最终找到那条“最适合”自己的成长路径。对宏润博源学校来说， 纪念一位伟人，最好的方式就是将闪耀的智慧，化为日常教学中的点滴实践，集思广益，砥砺前行。

  At Hongrun Boyuan School, breaking down disciplinary “walls” has always been a common and natural occurrence in science classrooms.

Dr. Chen-Ning Yang advocated the “permeation learning method,” opposing the fragmentation and rote transmission of knowledge while emphasizing the gradual accumulation and integration of learning through subtle influence. This approach aligns perfectly with our school's educational model of “personalized development + interdisciplinary integration.”

Beyond breaking down knowledge barriers, the story of how Mr. Yang Chen-ning and Mr. Lee Tsung-dao challenged the “parity conservation” law exemplifies the scientific spirit of “questioning based on evidence.” How does this spirit empower teachers to impart knowledge and resolve students' doubts?

One approach we take is to bring students “back in time.” In Teacher Wang's AP Physics class, students once recreated the “θ-τ puzzle” that sparked a revolution in physics. Divided into two teams—one representing established physicists defending traditional parity conservation, the other embodying the challenging “Yang-Lee team”—they engaged in intense classroom debates based on the contradictory experimental data from that era.

“We even deliberately introduce slight ‘errors’ or counterintuitive phenomena in some experiments,” says Mr. Wang. “The goal is to guide students to actively question seemingly perfect ‘standard answers.’ We want them to experience firsthand that the process of ‘boldly hypothesizing and cautiously verifying’ is far more important than memorizing a correct conclusion.”

In response to today's students' tendency to prioritize technical skills over foundational knowledge, Mr. Yang's maxim—“Better clumsy than clever, better plain than fancy”—offers a timely remedy.

In our view, “clumsiness” does not equate to stupidity—it signifies the steadfastness to willingly derive a formula from scratch and the resolve to put in the “dull, hard work.” “Simplicity” is not synonymous with rusticity—it embodies the integrity of meticulously recording raw experimental data and the purity of pursuing the essence of things.

Therefore, we not only implement the “formula tracing method” in foundational instruction, discouraging students from directly applying conclusions; we have also established a “raw experimental data archiving system.” Faculty evaluations will focus more on the depth of students' analysis and adherence to the principle of honesty, rather than whether the experimental results appear flawless. We believe that this “rustic” approach is the most reliable foundation for students' future academic journeys.

 From curriculum integration to critical thinking training and mindset guidance, we've discovered that sound educational philosophies share common ground. Mr. Yang once confided that his early experimental physics research faced setbacks. It was only through relentless exploration, deduction, and reflection that he ultimately found his own starry seas in theoretical physics.

Education demands persistent cultivation to yield profound results. Our school steadfastly practices this educational philosophy: rather than forcing every unique child into the same mold, we observe attentively and accompany them with care, helping them explore together to ultimately discover the growth path “best suited” to each individual. We are committed to delivering this approach to every student and parent. For Hongrun Boyuan School, the best way to honor a great man is to transform his brilliant wisdom into daily teaching practices—pooling wisdom and forging ahead with perseverance.